Ionic Care Theft and Fraud?

You Decide!
Find Truth Here Below! 

Dates are derived from email timestamps and UPS tracking details.

 
Date
Event Description
From/To
Key Evidence/Implication
May 18, 2025
Purchase of 1 Ionic Care device (Order #1147).
User (Allen Cherry) → Ionic Care
Initial transaction; 60-day guarantee advertised in product image. Sets baseline for refund eligibility.
May 28, 2025
(7:43 AM)
Ionic Care claims device "has been shipped out" and will arrive in next few days.
Ionic Care Support → User
First false shipment claim; no tracking provided. Builds false expectation, potential bait to delay complaints.
May 30, 2025 (12:05 AM)
User follows up, noting no shipping email or tracking received.
User → Ionic Care Support
User's frustration evident; highlights lack of transparency, no response with proof of shipment.
June 1, 2025
User emails to cancel order and request full refund, citing non-receipt after 12 days. Threatens credit card dispute if not resolved by June 5.
User → Ionic Care Support
Clear cancellation request within 60-day window; Ionic Care fails to honor, indicating bad faith.
June 2, 2025
(12:31 PM)
Ionic Care confirms order cancellation: "Okay I will mark the order to be cancelled as you wish."
Ionic Care Support → User
Explicit agreement to cancel; later shipment violates this, proving misrepresentation.
June 2, 2025 (1:24 PM)
User thanks for cancellation but notes potential delays due to "China tariffs." Plans to follow up in 1-2 months.
User → Ionic Care Support
User accepts initial resolution; shows good faith despite suspicions.
June 2, 2025 (10:31 AM)
Ionic Care requests tracking info again and promises to send it over, acknowledging shipment.
Ionic Care Support → User
Contradicts prior cancellation; inconsistent communication suggests internal disorganization or deception.
June 5, 2025
(3:07 AM)
Shipping update email: Shipment status updated with UPS tracking #YY731045082T. Item: 1 Ionic Care x1. Estimated delivery: September 8, 2025 (9:45 AM - 1:45 PM).
Ionic Care → User
Unauthorized shipment 3 days after cancellation confirmation; tracking shows label created 09/02/2025 (5:32 PM), departed Camp Verde, AZ (09/02/2025, 8:42 PM), delayed (09/04/2025, 3:51 AM), out for delivery. Proves fraud: Shipped post-cancellation, backdated tracking (label from September, not June), extreme delay (3+ months estimated).
June 9, 2025
(3:34 AM)
Ionic Care apologizes for warehouse error preventing cancellation; instructs user to wait for delivery, then return for refund.
Ionic Care Support → User
Admits error but shifts burden to user; no proactive refund, prolongs process.
June 9, 2025
(7:01 AM)
Ionic Care follow-up: Insures package arrives this week, asks for more patience and offers to "insure" user (likely typo for reassure).
Ionic Care Support → User
Renewed false promise; ignores return logistics, escalates delay tactics.
June 21, 2025
User emails frustration: 3 weeks/21 days with no shipping/tracking email, only promises. Demands mailing address for return/refund; states this is last email.
User → Ionic Care Support
Escalation due to radio silence; reiterates no address provided, blocking refund.
August 11, 2025
(1:46 PM)
Ionic Care apologizes for delay, provides return address (4391 Harger Ave, Post Falls, ID 83854, USA). Instructs to ship back, promises full refund after inspection.
Ionic Care Support → User
Long-overdue address (2+ months after request); conditional refund adds friction.
August 11, 2025
(2:09 PM)
User notes still no clear return address provided in prior response; demands it explicitly.
User → Ionic Care Support
Highlights ongoing opacity; Ionic Care's response buried address in fine print.
August 11, 2025 (4:13 PM)
User forwards prior exchange, reiterating need for return address.
User → Ionic Care Support
Persistent pursuit; shows user's diligence against company's evasion.
September 1, 2025
(3:40 PM)
Ionic Care apologizes for mix-up on June 2 cancellation; reconfirms return to same address for full refund once received/tracked.
Ionic Care Support → User
Admits cancellation was mishandled and shipment shouldn't have occurred; proves negligence/fraud: Internal failure led to unauthorized charge/shipment.
September 5, 2025 (est. delivery window: 8:30-11:00 AM)
UPS tracking update: Package at Camp Verde, AZ (label created 09/02/2025, 5:32 PM); on way, estimated Friday delivery to Post Falls, ID.
UPS (via Ionic Care tracking)
Confirms actual movement in September, not June; validates backdating suspicion. No delivery confirmation in provided images.
September 8, 2025 (est. delivery: 9:45 AM - 1:45 PM)
UPS tracking: Delay noted (09/04/2025); out for delivery to Post Falls, ID.
UPS (via Ionic Care tracking)
Final estimated delivery; if received, enables return but highlights 4-month total delay from purchase.
September 17, 2025 (6:29 AM)
Ionic Care confirms full refund processed for returned IonicCare product; notes delay due to bank processing time (few business days).
Ionic Care Support → User
Claims refund issued, but user confirms non-receipt, suggesting false processing report.
October 13, 2025 (3:14 PM)
User asks George at Ionic Care about refund status, noting it’s been almost a month with no credit card company confirmation. Requests proof of issuance.
User → George L. (Ionic Care)
Escalation due to non-received refund; demands evidence, indicating potential fraud in refund claim.
Analysis Proving Theft and Fraud, timeline strengthens the case for fraud and theft:
  • Unfulfilled Refund Promise: Despite Ionic Care's September 17 claim of a processed refund, your confirmation of non-receipt after nearly a month (by October 13) suggests they may have fabricated the refund issuance to avoid further liability.
  • Persistent Delays: The refund delay (if processed) exceeds reasonable bank processing times (typically 5-10 business days), and lack of proof amplifies suspicion of intentional withholding.
  • Theft Element: Retaining funds post-cancellation and post-return, with no verifiable refund, constitutes unauthorized retention of payment (~$ amount unspecified but full product cost). The backdated shipment and ignored cancellation further support deceit.
  • Recommendations: Request written proof (e.g., transaction ID) from Ionic Care immediately. File a credit card dispute with evidence of cancellation, return, and non-refunded status. Report to FTC (ftc.gov/complaint) and state AG for potential fraud investigation. If no response, escalate to consumer protection agencies.

Our Story, with Ionic Care! 

After all of this, they went ahead and shipped it!

Then Finally they admit they were wrong on

September 1st!

I still haven't got my Refund.
In my personal opinion
I think they are a BIG SCAM! BUYER BEWARE!
They got the Product Returned on September 8th.

What Grok AI says about Ionic Care, Official Ionic Care & Medbed! 

Is Ionic Care, Official Ionic Care and Medbed a Scam?

Based on current data from consumer reviews, scam detection tools, and investigative reports as of October 2025, yes, Ionic Care, Official Ionic Care, and Medbed-related products/services are highly likely scams or, at minimum, operations with deceptive, unproven claims and fraudulent practices. These entities exploit pseudoscientific hype around "terahertz technology" and "miracle healing" to sell ineffective devices or access to nonexistent treatments, often targeting vulnerable people seeking health solutions. They lack credible evidence, regulatory approval (e.g., no FDA validation for therapeutic claims), and have poor trust ratings. Below, I'll break it down by entity, drawing from recent reviews and analyses.Ionic Care and Official Ionic CareThese appear to be interconnected websites (ionic-care.net, ioniccare.net, officialioniccare.net) selling a "Terahertz Wand" or similar handheld device claiming to emit "terahertz waves" for pain relief, inflammation reduction, cellular healing, and improved circulation. Prices range from $200–$700, with aggressive ads promising "quantum healing."
  • Evidence of Scam Practices:
    • Low Trust Scores: Scam Detector rates ionic-care.net (11.4/100) and ioniccare.net (11/100) as "untrustworthy" and "risky," citing high-risk activity in the health products industry, recent domain registration (February 2025), and proximity to suspicious sites.
       
      Scamadviser flags them as "low trust" (potential scams) due to young domains and hidden ownership.
       
      Gridinsoft labels ioniccare.net a "suspicious shop" for data extraction risks.
       
      gridinsoft.com
    • Customer Complaints: Trustpilot (2.6/5 from 6 reviews) highlights non-delivery (e.g., orders from March 2025 still pending in June), bot-like customer service (e.g., "We are very busy, thanks for your patience"), ignored refund requests, and 1+ month shipping delays from China.
       
      trustpilot.com
      Users call it a "scam" and note the device is "just a hair dryer with a blue light" that does nothing.
       
      trustpilot.com
      No independent positive reviews; site testimonials are generic and suspected fakes.
    • Deceptive Marketing: Fact-checks debunk AI-generated "Fox News" clips endorsing "Tesla Ionic Care" as counterfeit, with no real endorsements from RFK Jr. or Trump.
       
      leadstories.com
      Claims of "terahertz healing" lack scientific backing; THz research is lab-based (e.g., for imaging, not consumer wands), and devices can't generate therapeutic levels safely.
       
      Amazon warnings label similar wands as "knock-off scams."
       
      amazon.com
    • Other Issues: No phone support, refund barriers (e.g., deny "used" items), and potential data theft. Reddit threads confirm it's an MLM-style scam targeting seniors.
       
      reddit.com
  • Risks: Financial loss ($200–$700), health delays (forgoing real treatments), and data breaches. FDA has warned similar "terahertz" devices for unapproved claims.
Medbed"Medbed" (or "Med Bed") refers to a conspiracy theory about secret, futuristic "medical beds" that cure all diseases, regenerate limbs, and reverse aging using alien/military tech hidden by elites. No real technology exists; it's a QAnon-adjacent myth popularized on Telegram, TikTok, and far-right forums since ~2020. Companies exploit it by selling "access" or pseudo-devices.
  • Evidence of Scam Practices:
    • Conspiracy Origins: Wikipedia and media reports trace it to QAnon, blending New Age pseudoscience ("frequencies," "biophotons") with claims of elite hoarding (e.g., JFK alive on a medbed).
       
      Trump amplified it in a deleted AI video (September 2025), promoting fake "MedBed cards."
       
    • Exploitation Scams: Companies like Tesla BioHealing sell "medbed centers" (e.g., motel rooms with canisters claiming "life force energy") for $160/hour or $20,000 generators, despite FDA warnings (2023) for unapproved claims.
       
      "Registration fees" ($300–$800) for future access are outright scams, often via Telegram/Facebook.
       
      Reddit calls it a "scam killing vulnerable people" by delaying real care.
       
    • No Scientific Basis: THz waves (used in claims) are real for imaging but unproven for healing; no peer-reviewed evidence for medbeds.
       
      FDA targets "misbranding" (e.g., Tesla BioHealing, 2023).
       
      en.wikipedia.org
    • Recent Hype: AI fakes (e.g., Trump's 2025 video) fuel spread, but outlets like BBC, NYT, and McGill OSS label it pseudoscience/grift.
       
  • Risks: Financial exploitation ($300–$20,000), health harm (delaying treatments), emotional manipulation via conspiracy communities.
Comparison Table: Key Scam Indicators
Entity
Trust Score (Avg.)
Common Complaints
Unproven Claims
Regulatory Issues
Ionic Care
10–11/100 (High Risk)
Non-delivery, bot support, no refunds
Terahertz healing (lab-only tech)
No FDA approval; fake ads
Official Ionic Care
16/100 (Suspicious)
Shipping delays, ignored emails
Ionic/terahertz wands for wellness
Low trust; data risks
Medbed
N/A (Mythical)
Fake registrations, MLM fees
Alien/military cure-all beds
FDA warnings; QAnon ties
Recommendations
  • Avoid Purchases: Do not buy; if you have, request chargebacks (60–120 days from purchase) and report to FTC (ftc.gov/complaint), IC3 (ic3.gov), or your State AG.
  • Alternatives: For pain/circulation, use FDA-cleared TENS units ($30–$50) or consult a doctor. For wellness, evidence-based options like exercise and hydration.
  • Report: Share experiences on Trustpilot/Reddit to warn others. If scammed, contact a consumer lawyer for small claims (e.g., <$10,000 in most states).
These operations prey on hope with zero evidence—stick to verified science.Disclaimer: This is not legal/medical advice. Consult professionals for health/financial issues; report suspicions to authorities.
 

Buyer Beware!

Â